Doug writes:
The shocking murder
of a teacher in Paris has brought thousands of people onto the streets to
support freedom of speech. The brutal killing is another example of terrorism
fuelled by religious extremism, like the Manchester Arena bombing which is also
in the news. How do we cope with this?
Samuel Paty was
killed for doing his job, which was caring for, educating, young children and
speaking about freedom and equality. Frankly this hits home to me particularly
because two of our sons are teachers, but we know that these atrocities can
happen to anyone.
The attacker was only
18 years old, and lived miles away but he read social media outpourings about
this situation. Why would he decide that he should act on it? There are those
whose beliefs go into areas of judgment and vengeance in a way that most of us
would never countenance.
The cartoons which
seem to have brought about this and earlier attacks were published by a
satirical magazine, Charlie Hebdo. Retribution followed. Yet it is one thing to
feel hurt at what someone has said or written, it is totally another to kill
them. And to retaliate in the name of a compassionate, merciful God should be
unthinkable.
I sometimes wonder
whether the idea of blasphemy is meaningful. If a person does not believe in (your)
god, then how can they be said to be offending the deity? They don’t know what
they are talking about. If someone is unkind to you or me, calling us nasty
names, it may feel hurtful but as they don’t even know you their judgment is
meaningless. But for a believer to be insulting to the god which they really
believe in and feel they understand, that might be authentic blasphemy. And for
the believer to kill someone who has spoken in a challenging way, to do it in
the name of the god they claim to believe in so strongly when all people are
children of God, isn’t that the ultimate blasphemy?
No comments:
Post a Comment